True or False: Proposed amendments may be amended by a 2/3 majority.

Prepare for the Professional Golf Management (PGM) Qualifying Test. Study with flashcards and multiple-choice questions—all with hints and explanations. Excel in your exam!

The statement regarding proposed amendments being amendable by a 2/3 majority is somewhat misleading. Typically, in many governance structures, amendments to amendments follow specific procedures, often requiring a simple majority vote rather than a supermajority, such as 2/3.

In this context, when discussing proposed amendments, it is important to highlight that the rules governing amendments can vary significantly based on the organization's bylaws or governing documents. Therefore, if the process described indicates that a proposed amendment can be amended, it often operates under the standard simple majority unless explicitly stated otherwise.

The idea is that allowing a proposed amendment to be amended might require a straightforward approach so that the process remains fluid and not overly complex, which could hinder the legislative process. This is why the assertion that such amendments may be amended by a 2/3 majority is deemed false without specific context indicating otherwise.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy